Bravo, Butker!

If Harrison Butker had spoken at my college graduation, I also would have wildly cheered him on as did the crowd at graduates at Benedictine College. But I didn’t hear the speech at my college graduation: I skipped my college graduation to be at my oldest daughter’s dance recital.

Read Butker’s full speech here:https://www.ncregister.com/news/harrison-butker-speech-at-benedictine

To most other moms it is not shocking that I would choose to skip my college graduation to be at an important event for my child. Neither is it infuriating that a man would stand in front of a graduating class and tell men and women that placing family above careers will bring them the greatest joy in life: Albeit it would be a pleasant surprise to the typical platitudes of graduation speeches. But for those who are horribly offended at Butker’s statements, my choice may seem unfathomable. I believe this is especially so given the context of my college graduation. It is for both my mom friends and my fellow deceived females that I explain why missing my college graduation was not a burden nor a loss.

In retrospect, I should have known that the culmination of my education thus far would result in missing graduation. In truth my graduation experiences peaked in 8th grade., for which I was showered with many academic and music awards. All my teachers gushed about how I was going to do great things. I am sure some of them were disappointed in later years when I did not meet their expectations, but I am nevertheless grateful for the devotion and patience of my grade school teachers.

My high school graduation did not prove to be as impressive. I graduated in the top three of my class, missing salutatorian by a few one hundredth of points. My best friends, the valedictorian and salutatorian, fully deserved their awarded titles: They had worked tirelessly to earn them. But I had gotten distracted and was graduating four months pregnant. My pregnancy was not a cause of my falling behind my friends academically. Although my morning classes during the last quarter were difficult to attend due to puking every day for 3 months.

Any regrets I had were the lagging guilt of not obeying my own standards of conduct or working harder to earn better grades. I had no plans to attend college at the time. I was quite happy to have a good job, a seemingly supportive husband, and a growing healthy pregnancy. I left high school with a decent education and the realization of most of my hopes. I had been able to perform as the co-lead in our spring musical and was chosen as a princess for the Prom Court. I graduated with honors and had been selected by my classmates to introduce our graduation speaker. My only hurts were those of a few friends (my best male friend was quite angry with me) who insisted I was wasting my mental abilities by not attending college immediately.

I gave birth to my first son and returned to work within 6 weeks. He was healthy and mostly thriving. My lovely mother-in-law was his full-time babysitter. I was working in retail management at the time at Carter’s. Despite all my skills I found it quite difficult to see mothers with their infants constantly. I frequently made mistakes, and my manager was losing her patience with me. However, after a friend recommended me to a higher position at Levi’s, my retail management career was fast tracked. In less than 3 years I was promoted to manager, the youngest in the company at the time. I had a lot of support from my upper management, almost all males. In fact, my direct manager for two years was an extremely fair and patient man. I am sure within a few years I would have been making close to six figures. But instead, I gave birth to a second child, a girl, and I chose to stay at home with both children.

If you are keeping score, I was now in my early twenties. I had set aside college and a promising career. I was at home changing diapers, breast feeding, teaching my older child preschool skills, and basically homemaking. All these things were a joy to me. The smiles and giggles, the training and disciplining, the endless hours of cleaning. It was others that were disturbed at my choices. It was former coworkers asking, “What do you do all day?” It was some other working moms who did not understand why I didn’t want to send my children to daycare. And unfortunately, it was also an unhappy husband who did not want to provide or care for a family, that threatened my contentment.

Indeed, one of the greatest threats to my happiness was not being a mother or wife but losing my first marriage to an unwanted divorce. As I attempted to gain my bearings (and confidence) God again brought many amazing men and women into my life. Every single person that encouraged me, helped with my children, or provided financial assistance were people living out their roles as husbands, fathers, grandparents, wives, or mothers. It never occurred to me to wish I did not have the burden of my children, but I fought to retain them with me as much as possible.

During this life change, I enrolled in college. Given the time since my high school days I had to begin with pre-collegiate math. For my first several semesters I only took one math course. It was all I could afford due to finances and time constraints. Eventually, I was able to take two courses at a time., and finished math with calculus, my only B grade in college. Who was my college math teacher? A man that was committed to provide for this family so that his college educated wife could homeschool. Again, this man did everything he could to ensure his students succeeded. While I was able to graduate from community college with honors my very high GPA did not count toward valedictorian or salutatorian positions because the majority of my degree was not earned as a full-time student

By the time I began full time at the university level, I was married. I was homeschooling one child, working on my husband’s family farm, and performing all the mom and wife duties. I loved every minute of it. I sometimes brought my youngest child to my classes, which were about 60 miles away. In fact, I had given birth to my third child before I graduated college. I graduated college with honors and the exact GPA of my high school years.

But, as I explained, I did not attend my college graduation. Technically, I had the option to walk twice, because I finished my final class during the summer. It was not even a consideration, when I realized that my daughter’s annual dance recital was on the same day as my graduation. Other people were disappointed for me. I appreciated the sentiment, but I had no thoughts of commiseration.

It was not just my college graduation that I missed. I again set aside a possible career, this time in teaching. After giving birth to my fourth child, it became apparent that our toddler was quite capable of manipulating every babysitter and her older siblings. I had been frequently substituting at our local school district, and our two older kids were homeschooling. It is not that it was impossible for me to work, but that my children needed my attention at home. Neither my husband nor I, have ever regretted our decision to forgo a full-time professional second income.

I hope all women (and men) who read this hear what I am trying to convey: Living out my God called roll as a wife and mother is what has brought me the greatest joy and fulfillment. I have faced imminent death twice, once due to an ectopic pregnancy. In those moments, I had no fleeting thoughts concerning fame or fortune. My thoughts (and flare prayers) were toward my husband, children, and the Savior, Who I was quite sure I was about to meet.

It is true that God calls individuals to different roles. I have several times in this short writing referred to individuals that invested in my well-being. The heart work that my mom friends and mentors have spent working in me made an eternal impression. But it was also many strong and virtuous men who respectfully protected me, provided for me, and patiently taught me that helped me realize my own calling. These people were not focused on themselves or the world’s vision of what they should be. It is they that continue to inspire me to do my best. They are also some of the happiest, most fulfilled people I know.

Butker made many references to Catholic doctrine which I cannot affirm, but he has every right to believe and say those things. I can affirm, that women have been sold a lie that professional success will bring them more happiness than a home with a husband and children. Yes, there are a few that can manage both, especially in different seasons of life. There are also a few women who are not called to be wives or mothers, but these women have other callings to service. So lean into your calling of God, not the desire of the spirit of the age.

Butker spoke the truth, a thing rarely spoken at college graduations. The media, and those who have lived in the deception of the media’s lies hate the truth. I can testify that they utterly hate women that speak and live the truth. The only people the media despises more than women unashamed to live primarily as homemakers, is the men strong enough to praise them. So bravo, Butker.

Wharton File #3: COVID, CDL and CRT (Part 2)

At the Nestucca Valley School District Townhalls held in the fall of 2023, Superintendent Wharton communicated that she was feeling more comfortable coming out [in public] since COVID. While some may find the belatedness of this comment shocking, I believe this remark is indictive of the mindset of government entities that were directly involved with enforcing COVID lockdowns. Having attended countless public meetings of governing bodies over the last 3 years I have personally witnessed the “Zoom” mind virus that plagued public servants.

What do I mean by “Zoom” mind virus? It is a psychopathy that infected public servants during COVID lockdowns who were able to “meet” behind their screens while allowing them speak their unreasonable fears and neo-Marxist theories into public policy with no or minimal public input. These decisions had the potential power to affect the free citizens within their jurisdictions in the intimate details of their lives. Similar to the symptoms of those experiencing “long COVID,” those infected with the “Zoom” mind virus had difficulties returning to their pre-COVID state. The difference being that many did not want to return to their pre-“Zoom” mind virus limited powers: The lure and deception of their real (and imagined) power over others had become their modus operandi.

So what kinds of decisions were made by Superintendent Wharton and the Nestucca Valley School Board during COVID?

  1. The adoption of race-based policies. As communicated in previous blogs I have the nerdy habit of reading policies. I have read numerous company policy books, proposed government policies, and many draft legislation bills. I have written policies in private spheres. Policies are foundational and set the tone for every entity. However, when I read “JHH Student Suicide Prevention” (https://policy.osba.org/nestucca/J/JHH%20D1.PDF) I was confronted with the true intent behind DEI initiatives: Division, Exclusion and Isolation. I could not have described that as such at the time, but this definition was given to me by a fellow rural Oregonian and describes perfectly the environment DEI policies create.                           Why do I categorize this policy as a DEI initiative? The policy clearly defines “Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and other minority gender identity and sexual orientation, Native American, Black, Latinx, and Asian students” as part of a specific high-risk identities besides the obvious students (mentally ill, “substance” abusers, “homeless,” or those “bereaved by suicide”). There is no evidence cited for these special categories and the various potential issues. The danger of focusing on a student’s perceived identity by staff versus actual student behavior should be self-evident.
  2. The advent of “identity” focused programs. In reality, there were probably multiple “identity” focused programs introduced during this time period. Public school officials rarely see the need to announce to non-school employed adults they are starting a Gay-Straight Alliance or Hispanics ONLY club. Most adults recognize these clubs as subversive to traditional morals (and parents), anti-American and unnecessarily divisive. However, Nestucca Valley School District was so proud of the Diverse Pathways Educators Program that is was introduced by the school counselor, Sharman Ensminger during a Zoom only attendance board meeting in late spring 2021. This program, a mentor program to recruit “diverse” teachers from the current student body, was presented as limited to those who are “racially and/or linguistically diverse.” Here is the current link on the Northwest ESD for that program: https://www.nwresd.org/departments/instructional-services/professional-learning/diverse-educator-pathways Here is one of the slides presented at the meeting by Ensminger concerning this program.          

As late as spring this program was still being advertised at Nestucca. This flier came from the May 2023 Nestucca High School newspaper :

When this DEP program was created I attempted to get all involved to explain who was eligible for this program. I left multiple messages with the Northwest ESD program managers, and only got a response after calling upper management in Northwest ESD. No one would ever confirm whether “whites” or English only speakers would be admitted. Although the Nestucca Valley School District later insisted everyone could apply.

3. Identity based appointees to the school board. Of course, the ultimate triumph of DEI initiatives is to put them in practice by hiring “diverse” candidates. As a majority white community, the elected school board members have been white and married with kids. However, when school board chair, Evan Carver resigned in September 2021 an opportunity arose to appoint a board member. Board meetings were in flux between in person and Zoom attendance only. Indeed, with the introduction of the Delta version of COVID, Oregon went back into mask requirements in all public buildings. This also was a signal to Nestucca School board to retreat back to Zoom meetings. Therefore, when the school began to advertise the application for the open board position only four people applied, and very few people noticed.

The applicants were three parents of school aged children, including myself, and Linda Fielder. Linda Fielder had relocated from the Portland are to the district only a few years ago. She had very limited experience with children, was a advocate and member of the LGBTQ community, and according to multiple reports was a longtime friend of Superintendent Wharton’s spouse. While Fielder presented as a gentle and thoughtful candidate, but she was neither a parent nor an established community member. Furthermore, one of the other parent candidates, Doug Keller, was a retired naval captain. All of us paled compared to both Keller’s resume and his dignified demeanor. Who did Nestucca Valley School District choose to appoint? Linda Fielder. Fielder proved herself by maintaining the status of quo of the school board. The status quo of Nestucca Valley School Board since 2016 had been don’t ask questions and vote yes on everything brought before the board by the superintendent.

4. Labeling parents as “threatening” and calling the police to board meetings. In late August 2021, Secretary of Education Merrick Garland announced that parents attending school board meetings were “domestic terrorist threats (Camera, 2021–see pdf link below). Whatever went on behind the scenes between national, state, and local schoolboard associations, Nestucca Valley School District was already accusing parents of being “threatening ” prior to Garland’s letter to the FBI and public announcement. https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/house/114235/documents/HHRG-117-GO00-20211116-SD004.pdf

In fact, it was after the August 2021 Nestucca Valley School District labeled me “physically threatening.” How was I “physically threatening”? That was never explained to me. As I replied to the Chair, I am a middle-aged, 5’2, 110 lb. woman: No one finds me threatening. I certainly never made threats to the board or the Superintendent. I did refuse to wear a mask to this meeting for several reasons. There actually was no mask mandate in effect until later that week, because for some reason Oregon thought mask mandates were so effective that they announced them about a week in advance of requiring them. However, about half of the attendants were also not wearing masks to this meeting. Interestingly, I was the only one who received a growled yell to put on a mask. Every person that attended the meeting, except the school board members, identified Superintendent Wharton as the one who yelled, “Put on a mask,” at me as I turned my back to her.

In February 2022 several other parents were also identified as a threat because we insisted on attending the board meeting in-person. This meeting was to decide if students would continue to be forced to wear masks in school and whether part-time employees and volunteers would be allowed COVID vaccine exemptions. The school refused to hold an in-person meeting, so the parents attended outside. The school called the police to “keep the peace.” The officer assigned knew most of us. He told us that the sheriff’s department had only agreed to send him to ensure the parents were treated well. He left for the majority of the meeting, but returned when the board members left the building, at the request of the school administration. No one had threatened anyone, unless you term a potential recall of the board members a threat. But it wasn’t a threat it was a promise.

Wharton File #3: COVID, CDL, and CRT Policies, Part 1 (Why I Filed a Second Complaint)

When my family returned from Lancaster, California to the Nestucca Valley in June of 2020, the world had changed. Returning to the rural Oregon Coast after living in northern Los Angeles county through the COVID and George Floyd riot lockdowns seemed like an escape from a modern dystopian Egypt to the Promised Land. We knew Oregon’s governor had adopted most of the same restrictive COVID mandates as California’s Gavin Newsom, but we also believed our rural area would be less affected. How effective could a mask mandate be in a community of farmers and loggers? How many people in a small town would actually succumb to the Black Lives Matter mantras? Unfortunately, we underestimated the power of fear (in regard to irrational COVID beliefs) and lure of virtue signaling politics.

At the beginning of COVID, Nestucca Valley School District seemed to follow the same trajectory as most of the school districts in our nation. They closed in mid-March 2020, initiated a type of distance learning (public school at home) and developed all kinds of programs to facilitate continuing previous services, such as free lunches. Infamously, this included universal promotion and graduation despite student performance or participation. Perhaps the only positive advantage the graduating class of 2020 experienced was their “graduation” was moved to the majestically beautiful Cape Kiwanda. This was one of the few outside graduations ever permitted by Nestucca Valley School District. Whether the graduates and their families remember this graduation as a gratifying capstone to the their K-12 education is arguable, but it was undoubtedly memorable.

While there were plenty of complaints and frustrations with the initial COVID school closures at NVSD, the general sentiment was that there was both a novel virus and draconian state mandates for the administration to mitigate. In general, parents and community members accepted loss of school post Spring Break of 2020 as an unavoidable annoyance. However, as it became evident that the school was not going to open in fall of 2020, parents became increasingly frustrated. In our rural district, this was not merely based on the inconvenience of the use of schools as free daycare. This a region that still lacks internet or cellular service in large swaths and it made the comprehensive distance learning model unrealistic.

Furthermore, up until the COVID closures the school had been the focal point of the community: Community involvement and support for the school was extremely high. This loss for both young and old of the prime gathering place of the community was felt deeply. The lack of social interactions for the children of the district created a communal, generational scar. At the time, some of us knew this and rejected the premise that this virus was as an excuse for denying children their previous social norms. What remains to be shocking is that the administration of Nestucca still maintains all these losses were justified, contrary to scientific or empirical data since published and observed. Even more shocking was the willingness, especially of Superintendent Wharton, to adopt polices more draconian than those of the state of Oregon.

To illustrate this issue to those who are outside of our school district or have chosen to forget, consider these three examples:

  1. Nestucca Valley School District was quite possibly the longest closed school district in the state. The largest school district in our county, Tillamook School District, re-opened in December 2020, but Nestucca opened post Spring Break 2021. That is one year of school closure.
  2. Nestucca maintained some of the most invasive and authoritarian mandates in the state of Oregon, a state nationally ridiculed due to their COVID mandates. While it is true that technically most school districts in our state “required” student masking in their buildings, very few enforced them with such vehemence. According to many witnesses this included: Threatening of teacher licenses for refusing to enforce student masking, denial of employee medical exemptions from masking, outside masking for students during recess and sports activities, mask mandates for all adults on school premises (unless inside their cars), and requiring student masking outside THEIR homes to receive food drop offs from the school’s federally funded free lunch program.                           Then there was the COVID vaccine mandate. Again, Oregon was one of the worst offenders for attempting to forcibly require all adults to take the COVID vaccine. Oregon Department of Education at one point had a policy that required education employees to receive every CDC approved COVID vaccine and booster. Every single one. https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/ORED/bulletins/2ee82d4 Although, a staff member could apply for an exemption it was made clear at the March 2022 NVSD board meeting that all religious exemptions for part-time employees were rejected by NVSD. In fact, volunteers (mostly parents) were not welcome in the school through mid-spring 2022. After much public outcry, volunteers were allowed back in the school and for after school activities. However, they were forced to comply with vaccination requirements or have a religious exemption personally approved by Superintendent Wharton. Volunteers (and part-time employees) were also expected to sign a strict quarantine agreement should they test positive for COVID.
  3. Nestucca moved the 2021 graduation to the new grade school and limited attendance to a few guests for each senior. Instead of electing to use the gym at the high school or any outside options, NVSD chose to host the 2021 high school graduation in their new K8 Building. At the time the venue change, traditionally Nestucca High School, was not made available to the public and effectively limited potential attendees. Another last minute change, according to seniors and their family members, required graduates to submit a limited guest list (less than 10) so that a list could be compiled. As a person who had been invited to this graduation prior to this demand (and a defiant attendee) I can testify that a list was kept at the door of the venue and guests were verified before granted entry. I will leave the rebel employee unnamed who approved my entrance, but I am forever grateful to them . Their kindness allowed me and my oldest daughter to attend the graduation of a dear friend of our family whom I had had the privilege of mentoring.

The above is just a glimpse of Nestucca’s COVID abuses. Having spoken to numerous parents and community members about this issue I have concluded a whole book could be compiled concerning this time period. As a conclusion to COVID specific challenges I would like to remind the reader of one of the most ridiculous and audacious COVID mandates made personally by Superintendent Wharton: She publicly stated that families receiving food deliveries via the school bus must wear masks outside their own homes or else the bus would refuse to stop.

Here is a copy of Superintendent Wharton’s letter to the community.

I became aware of this because at the time I lived in a neighborhood with many school children. The neighborhood was on a 1-mile graveled loop that I frequently ran, walked, or biked around. When I witnessed children outside in masks only during the time that the school bus delivered food, I asked my neighbors why their children were in masks outside. They informed me of this requirement by the Superintendent. Outside play at this time of the pandemic was one of the few times children congregated in our neighborhood. It was only while the bus was delivering food, that they were not allowed to see one another’s faces. As any normal person would be, I was horrified. I found the above letter to the community on the school website and filed a complaint with the school district. Here is the complaint I filed.

The NVSD board’s ruling is below as the first email. The related emails follow, and are in backwards chronological order.

In utter disgust and frustration, I wrote my first letter to the editor to the local newspaper, the Headlight Herald. As my letters have been a major point of contention raised by the October 2023 letter read by Superintendent Wharton, this letter is included below. Alternatively, here is the link o the Headlight Herald article. https://www.tillamookheadlightherald.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/letter-nestucca-superintendent-off-base-with-mandatory-masks-order/article_880aa0be-3429-11eb-b5f7-d34c73850bf0.html

I then filed my second complaint against Superintendent Wharton with the Teacher’s Practices and Standards Commission. This complaint was initially assigned to the same investigator that handled the first complaint. This investigator had admitted to me that I had a valid concern about the school website falsification (see https://wordpress.com/block-editor/post/apprehendedbychrist.com/430) but asked me if I would “just drop” the first complaint because it would not change the outcome of the passed school policies. I immediately requested that this complaint be reassigned. To their credit TSPC reassigned the complaint to another investigator. I also filed a complaint with the USDA and Oregon Child Nutrition for what seemed to me a denial of services to underprivileged children based on a political agenda and gross misconduct. Superintendent Wharton’s claim that these investigations have been financially costly to the district in nonsensical. Either she required masks to be worn for food distribution to private homes or she didn’t . The only reason it would have been costly is if the district consulted their lawyers outside of their contracted coverage, the school district refused to comply with the investigation, and/or were found liable and were forced to pay a fine. In any of those cases that fault would lie with the administration of Nestucca Valley School District.

COVID abuses aside, this time period brought with it numerous other issues. These issues will be covered in Part 2 of Wharton File #3.

Wharton File #2: The First Complaint I Filed Against Superintendent Wharton

As I began to receive messages and phone calls about the letter Superintendent Wharton read at the board meeting on October 16, 2023, I recognized the feeling of shock, disbelief, and hurt accompanied with witnessing abusive of power by those in public office. Every time someone relays their negative interactions with those is position of authority I remember the board meeting that began the demolition of my past trust of those with institutional power at Nestucca Valley School District.

Pre-COVID most of us understood that there was corruption in our governing bodies. However, most of us believed that corruption and deceit was for those with centralized power: Presidential administrations, the IRS, Congress, state governors, and possibly a few rogue county and city officials. But, Superintendent Wharton is right that I was, ” . . . confrontational before the trend of confrontational board meetings was a thing.” Although confrontational must be defined as asking questions, insisting on answers, and respectfully disagreeing with proposed policies. My first “confrontational” board meeting was in June 2019.

I have already written about this extensively in a previous post you can read in, “What’s that Smell in Our Sleepy Nestucca Valley” (https://wordpress.com/post/apprehendedbychrist.com/323) and in detail “How to Ruin a School District in 3 Years . . .” (https://wordpress.com/post/apprehendedbychrist.com/328). I really advise you read these short articles for context. The first post, “What’s that Smell in Our Sleepy Nestucca Valley,” was posted on June 24, 2019. Again if math is not your thing, that was just over 4 years ago. This post makes this lone comment about the Superintendent: “under the direction of our superintendent, [Nestucca Valley School Districit] has taken on many projects this last year.” This hardly meets the muster of Superintendent Wharton’s claims of “constant scrutiny” and “being targeted.” It wasn’t until my, “How to Ruin a School District . . .” post in July 20, 2019 that I “targeted” Superintendent Wharton, if you call holding a public official to account targeting.

So given these past posts, the only blogs until this series about Nestucca Valley School District, this post has the purpose of suppling the public with the documentation no longer available on the school website, as well as my own documents never before made available to the public.

Here I establish the following:

  1. My “confrontational” behavior began with the school board for their public meeting violations and refusal to (again) make publics records available to the public.
  2. Confrontation seems to mean to the Nestucca Valley School Board and Superintendent normal civic engagement: Request for public documents, proper ordering of agendas, arguments made is public against proposed policies, request for readdress of grievances, mild petitions requesting moratorium on policies not made available to the public, and more than two members of the public at the school board meeting.
  3. It was never my intention to lay blame to the Superintendent for the board’s actions, until the school website was falsified in regards to this specific passing of policies. The website remained in this false state until the school upgraded the website and removed board information prior to July 2020, as of the publication of this post.
  4. Based on the above I filed a complaint my first with Nestucca Valley School District Board and then with Teacher’s Practicum and Practices, against Superintendent Wharton in an attempt to right a public wrong against the people of the Nestucca Valley School District. I never filed anything that could be considered a personal grievance complaint with any governing body until September 2023.

My “Confrontational” Behavior

By June of 2018, I had witnessed consistent public meeting law violations, such as not lawfully posting meetings, not following the agenda, allowing employees to speak out of turn during the meeting, and repeated delays and denials for requests of supposedly “available upon request” public documents. So I wrote a letter to the school board expressing my concerns. It was the Nestucca Valley School Board, not myself, that put Superintendent Wharton in the position to answer for their behavior. Although, I have written many emails over the years to Superintendent Wharton, the majority of my emails have been addressed to the elected school board members.

Here is that first letter with the Superintendent’s responses highlighted in yellow.

The concerns raised in this letter were held by many in our school district who were aware of the issues. However, at the time I was usually the only member of the public attending the school board meetings. Occasionally, the student body president and a few employees attended, but rarely did any other parents or community members attend.

During these early meetings, I often sat as an observer and reserved questions for after the meeting or emails. Most of the emails were for clarification of the issues addressed at the meeting, as at this time there were no informational “packets” available. The informational packets that are now available online and at the meeting were based on my repeated requests for information. If you have attended a school board meeting you understand the reason behind these packets: The Superintendent, and sometimes the board members, speak in eduspeak. They use terms and acronyms unfamiliar to the general public. I usually had an idea of what was being discussed because of my educational degree and work in the school. I knew most people did not have that background. Furthermore, the use of consent agendas by the board meant that financial reports, minutes, and administrator reports were neither read out loud in the meeting or available to the audience. This made the meetings confusing, disorienting, and unappealing for attendees.

Up to this point, the only reason to find my behavior “confrontational” is if the board and Superintendent believed no one should attend their meetings or have related questions to the meetings. That all changed in spring of 2019. In spring of 2019, Nestucca Valley School Board was going through an obscene amount of policy adoption. This was necessary, according to the Superintendent, because the current policies were outdated. These update in policies required the meeting postings to be several pages longer, so it was hard to ignore the many pages taped to the school door. Curiously, the actual policies (required by law to be available to the public before adoption) were not on the school website, just the list of policies to be changed in the meeting agendas.

Of course, the titles of the policies immediately raised my concern. A few of the policies I had concerns about were titled “Weapons in the Schools,” “Freedom of Expression [Students],” “Teaching About Religion,” and “Human Sexuality, AIDS/HIV, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Health Educations”[Comprehensive Health Education]. So I began asking for copies of the policies after the May 2019 school board meeting. None of the policies were discussed or read by the school board members. The policies were not available on the website, and EVEN Superintendent Wharton only claims there were as of June 6, 2019 (See “Misty Wharton Emails June 2019 Policy Adoption” below).

Here are the trails of emails between myself and the then board secretary, Megan Kellow, as I attempted get copies of the policies. Note that Megan never stated they were available on the school website as of June 12th.

What should be clear is on June 12th I received copies of the “I” Instruction policies which included very controversial policies. Below are the copies I received on June 12th of three of these policies. While there may be disagreement about what people find controversial, time has borne the truth that these were policies that many parents have since found disturbing. Of note, is the IGAI “Human Sexuality . . .” policy, especially in regards to items #17 (“different sexual orientations, gender identities and gender expressions”) and #18 (“laws that protect the rights of minors to anonymously access these [health] resources.”

As I was finally able to read these policies I became very concerned. The policies had undergone their first reading according to the June 10, 2019 NVSD school board agenda, so they could be adopted at the next meeting in July. As my last email from Megan states, I asked that the policies be placed on the school website as soon as possible for public review. Megan never replied so I took the next step of emailing the the NVSD board members, and once again heard from Superintendent Wharton. Her reply left me stunned.

Here is the succession of emails between Superintendent Wharton and myself on June 20, 2019.

*Note these emails are in backwards order, and should be read from the bottom up.

I remember sitting in utter shock that the NVSD Board had passed policies in my presence after I had expressed concern about the policies not being available to the public during my public comment, and I didn’t even know they did it. I am sure most people find that hard to believe, but here is why I was confused: The June 10. 2019 meeting agenda listed these policies as “7.3 Second Reading of Policy/Policy Adoption–Deletion (Packet of Policy provided [to the board] on May 13, 2019) [with this subsection) Policy First Reading–Proposed Adoption.” (See below, page 3). And they never read or discussed the policies. I had two other parent witnesses in this meeting who also were unaware the policies were passed.

Up to this point I never believed the board members, many of whom I had known for decades, or the superintendent capable of such deception. I was utterly horrified. I contemplated the full ramification of the NVSD board’s actions, the delays of response by the board secretary and the superintendent. They had passed policies they knew would be controversial without a single person in the public having copies of the policy. Because if it had been available by June 6th, as Superintendent Wharton insisted, why would I have not been directed to the school website versus getting copies from the board secretary?

I admit what I relate next is my testimony. Superintendent Wharton may remember these events differently, but I include them because I think it illustrates both our previous amicable relationship and our difference in worldviews. But I do here try to fairly represent what was told me directly by the Superintendent, as well as my own statements.

As it happened I drove by the school shortly after this revelation and noticed the Superintendent’s vehicle was parked at the district school office. I still believed Superintendent Wharton would be honest and open with me, so I took a chance and stopped to see if I could talk to her. This was late June and the office otherwise empty. When I walked up to the door it was locked so I knocked and the Superintendent opened the door to talk to me.

I expressed my main concerns about the policies, including the possibility of the “Teaching on Religion” policy being unconstitutional. Directly behind the Superintendent was a calendar depicting what looked like a Hindu goddess on the wall. I found it particularly interesting given our current conversation, freedom of religion.

I stated, “Aren’t you concerned that if you try to enforce a policy that states that teachers can neither ‘overtly or covertly’ endorse a religion that the district will be sued? There are teachers who teach in our schools and can regularly be seen attending churches on the same road and hill as the high school.”

Superintendent Wharton shrugged and said, “I didn’t write the Constitution and school districts get sued all the time, April.”

I soon left the district office. I thanked the Superintendent for her honesty and frankness. Needless to say I found no comfort in this interaction. I realized it was not just a minor philosophical or religious world view difference between Superintendent Wharton and most of the community of our school district. This was a major difference of respect for freedom and individual rights. The kind that is difficult to reconcile.

I hope by this time it is clear. I have never attacked the Superintendent’s life style choices or religious views. I believe that God gives all people the freedom to choose their life path and religious beliefs. I believe He is the only one that can hold individuals responsible for their rejection of truth and Himself. I also believe I am called to love everyone. IF I “attack,” “target,” or “scrutinize” people it is actually not them but their behavior, words, and works. Generally speaking this “scrutiny” is reserved for those in public office making decisions for the public. I state this emphatically only because it has been repeated to me by several under the influence of the Superintendent that I am against her lifestyle choices and that is my source of disagreements with her. That is not true, and I do not think anyone has evidence of such an accusation.

However, all people have their own agendas built on their core values and beliefs. I attempt to align my core values and beliefs on the Word of God. Others have their own basis for their values and beliefs that may contradict mine. I do not think that means that we cannot live together in a community and be good neighbors. But it does mean we have to agree on certain principles, like freedom of expression, speech, and religion.

As I tried to get my bearings from shock of all of these happenings, I had a bigger shock. Shortly after my meeting with Superintendent Wharton the school website under the board meeting tab had the new policies added under the May meeting packet. Below is my screen shot of the website at that time.

This was how the school website looked for 2 years. These policies were the only ones ever listed like this on the board meeting tab. Over the years I requested the board remove this false record more than 3 times. For awhile I asked them at every meeting. Needless to say it did not make the board members very happy that I refused to stop telling the truth about this issue.

It was for the falsification of the school website concerning the posting of these policies that I filed my first complaint. Superintendent Wharton claimed in her letter that I have filed “numerous complaints” against her and the board of directors, and that this cost the district thousands of dollars in legal fees (stated November 3, 2023 in executive session). I have previously filed two claims prior to September 19, 2023 First Amendment complains (of which Superintendent Wharton was unaware when she read her letter) and one concerning her letter filed on October 23, 2023.

The first complaint filed with the board was against the Superintendent for falsifying the website as seen here.

The NVSD Board ruled that they “did not need to further investigate the complaint filed July 23, 2019. ” So I filed a complaint to the Oregon Teachers Standards and Practices Commission. This was because at the time Oregon Ethics Commission only had jurisdiction over matters concerning misuse of public funds. If the school board or the Superintendent spent school funds to consult legal on this complaint then I suggest they misused funds. Either the website was falsified at the direction of Superintendent Wharton or it was not. That would have required the board to ask about three people under their employ how the website had been changed. Superintendent Wharton should have had access to legal representation through the teacher’s union, which I assume she belongs (Oregon Educators Association).

Aside from filing the complaints my confrontational behavior on this issue included soliciting signatures for a petition asking for a moratorium on the policies passed without public inspection.

Here is a copy of that petition.

In the end the NVSD Board decided to ignore those that signed this petition and the request of the ten or more people that attended the August 2019 board meeting. But they did decide to establish a policy committee. Diane Boisa had told me she wanted to appoint me to this committee. However, it was at this time that our family temporarily moved to Lancaster, California for my husband to attend West Coast Baptist College. Other than follow up with the TSPC complaint, I had no dealings from October 2019-June 2020 with Nestucca Valley School District.

Unfortunately, as we all know things did not improve during this school year. In fact, if anything things became exponentially worse because of COVID, Comprehensive Distance Learning, and the introduction of CRT policies.

Wharton File #1: Targeted by Ms. April Bailey for 8 Years?

The First Nestucca Board Meetings I Ever Attended and My First Published Article About Superintendent Wharton

On October 16, 2023, the Superintendent of Nestucca Valley School District, Misty Wharton, made an unprecedented statement targeting an individual and reporter, saying, “So many of our issues as district are created by one person spreading misinformation.” This statement was about me, a wife, mother of four, homeschool mom. and reporter. To counter that this is a wild exaggeration against a citizen that has had no institutional power to make decisions in school policy or practice is an understatement. Any rational person understands that this could not possibly be true.

So what is true? Truth about human behavior and their statements can be difficult to establish. It is also never within human capacity to accurately identify the motives of individuals. However, truth claims documented by public statements, public documents, and eye witness testimony can give those in search of the truth a firm foundation of facts. The goal of the Wharton Files is to present the facts to the reader for them to make their own judgements. There will be many installments that will focus on the claims made by the allegations of Superintendent Wharton’s letter as shared in full here. All documentation that I possess to counter the claims will also be available. If I make a claim solely based on my testimony, I will disclose that as well, but those will be few if included at all. In other words, what is shared here will be what can be substantiated.

* The edits to this letter are as submitted to me by Superintendent Wharton upon request of a copy of her publicly read letter.

Letter Read by Superintendent Wharton on 10/23//23

Why am I bothering to counter the obvious lies spat out about me by Superintendent Wharton?

  1. I have endeavored to publicly share the gospel of Christ with my neighbors. While He needs no defense, and is my defense, allowing such a blatant attack on my character to go unchallenged discredits my integrity. I do not expect my neighbors to believe my testimony of Christ if I lie in my other dealings.
  2. My love for my neighbors compels me to challenge anyone who behaves tyrannically toward them. No one should be bullied by one of the highest tax- payer paid public officials in our county. If we have zero tolerance for school bullies than school administrators should be held to the same standard, and if we allow this behavior one time it will be repeated.
  3. The citizens and parents of our district deserve the truth about the corruption of their school administration and the historical actions of the school board. I have a passion to be educated about local issues and share that knowledge. It is true that I have an approximate 7 years of experience with attending Nestucca Valley School Board meetings, requesting and reading their minutes, and asking questions. It is also true that I have made mistakes along the way. I am merely a regular citizen trying to be involved and inspire others to be involved, empowering them with essential tools and facts. My goals is not so much to convince people to think like me, but give them the full story beyond the district narrative and often silent or appeasing local media.

The Beginning: Why and When I Started Attending Board Meetings

Like many of us, 2016 was a political awakening for me. I learned that I could become an elected Republican PCP by adding my name to the ballot where there was no name and getting two other people to vote for me. But in truth my political bent can be traced back to my high school years as one of the youngest members of the school newspaper, The Nestuccian. In other words, I am a political nerd.

I have also been heavily involved with educational issues my entire life. From my grade school years of being sent to work with struggling readers (because I completed my class work quickly and couldn’t resist talking to other classmates) to homeschooling my own children and eventually earning my teaching degree, I care deeply about education.

Actually, my main mentor teacher for my licensure program was Misty Wharton. Misty was very liberal in allowing me to succeed and fail with her students. I hope we would both categorize our working relationship at that time as amicable and respectful. I have taught in various settings: Private tutoring, substitute teaching at Nestucca, local church AWANAS programs, and Bethel Christian School in my one year of residency in Lancaster, California. But the majority of my teaching experience has been homeschooling our four children (2 graduates) and our church’s Sunday School and Bible Clubs.

Nestucca Valley School District was also experiencing changes in the spring of 2017, for those who are math challenged that was 6.5 years ago (see the letter above). According to the minutes of Nestucca Valley School District (see below) sometime between January 2017 and February 2017, Misty Wharton became the Interim Superintendent after a quick succession of 3 superintendents within approximately 7 years.

I admit I found this interesting. To be fair, my interactions with the former administrator, David Phelps, were positive. He presented himself as professional, invested in the students, and very welcoming to homeschool families. I was unaware of the inner school agitations, and still do not quite understand them from that time period. So, like many, I found the sudden administration change strange.

Shortly, after this I saw the posting of the school board meeting on the high school door, and decided to attend the meeting. Curiosity, not an attempt to target Superintendent Wharton, is why I attended the first board meeting. What I witnessed was a board secretary attempting to run the meeting. The board secretary at the time was the HR manager, and I have no doubt that she had an overabundance of responsibilities. It had to have been a stressful situation for her. Superintendent Wharton did not attempt to intercede, and the board chair made some attempts to maintain order. To give an example of how badly organized the situation was here are few email exchanges with myself and the board secretary. The point of contention was giving me copies of the minutes, which were obviously not available online.

*Email threads can be confusing, but are left in tact and unedited here for transparency. For clarity, read them in backwards order.

What I learned from the entirety of these minutes is not important at this time, but the lesson I learned was to be perseverant. Governing bodies must adhere to Public Meeting Law, but if nodoby is watching they sometimes get sloppy. The truth is that I did not get the full packet of board minutes without calling the board chair, Annis Leslie. Annis insisted that all of the requested minutes be sent to me, and I am grateful for her commitment to transparency on this issue.

My First Published Article: A Community, Committed Superintendent

It was also during this time that a spent a short season as a reporter for the local news website, Tillamook County Pioneer. It was a very interesting and fun experience for me. My editor, Laura Swanson, was gracious and gave me a local story to cover for my first assignment: The hiring of Misty Wharton as full time Superintendent at Nestucca Valley School District. Given our history, I emailed her requesting an interview, and she responded that it would be easier for her to give a written response.

Here is her email response, and below that is my first article, published May 30, 2017 (less than 6.5 years ago) Providing the link is not changed here is the link to the article available on the Tillamook County Pioneer.

https://www.tillamookcountypioneer.net/nestucca-valley-school-districts-new-superintendent-carries-on-a-commitment-to-community/

*Emails are unedited for transparency. Read the emails in backwards order for clarity.

Superintendent Wharton’s Answers:

Text version of my article:

If you find where I “scrutinized” and “targeted” Superintendent Wharton let me know in the comments. Did I have personal concerns about her promotion. Yes. I had sat in her classroom. I ate lunch in the teacher’s lounge with her. I had heard statements and seen actions that I had serious ideological disagreement. But, I had for the most part seen her behave judiciously in her classroom, and believed we shared the vision of high education standards for the school district. The only lasting possible negative result against Superintendent Wharton from this article was I take responsibility for my work. Had she made choices that embraced parental rights, diversity of thought, fiscal responsibility, moral conduct and educational excellence I would have written further articles of support.

My goal in any article or post concerning Nestucca School District issues was never to attack individuals, but to bring up important issues that were unknown to the public. Tax payers and parents deserve accountability and educational excellence in their investment in public schools. Anything that diminishes the safety, academic rigor, or moral character of children in public schools should be publicly scrutinized in order to reset those foundational standards,

What was my first public criticism of her? That will be the subject of the next installment. Stay tuned.

LOCKDOWNS AND LAWSUITS: THE LEGACY OF BELL’S FIRST TERM AS TILLAMOOK COUNTY COMMISSIONER

Tillamook County Commissioners Erin Skaar and Mary Faith Bell holding Indoor Mask Mandate Sign in front of Tillamook County Fair 2021Photo from video via Tillamook County Fair Facebook Page 

Many business owners affected by the COVID-19 lockdowns have filed lawsuits against state and federal entities. However, counties have not been exempt from these lawsuits as exhibited in “Mankins Family LLC Pacific City Inn) versus Tillamook County, OR” This lawsuit alleges that the Tillamook Board of Commissioners’ resolutions from March-May 2020 concerning the closing of the transient lodging caused unnecessary financial harm to the Mankins due the questionable wording of the resolution. The Tillamook County Commissioner that testified in this hearing is Mary Faith Bell. Mary Faith Bell has been a Tillamook County Commissioner since 2019, and is currently running for re-election.

Specifically, this deposition covers whether the county had enforcement power to close businesses in unincorporated portions of the county. The deposition presents a strong case that the County Commissioners knew they had no legal power to “shut down” businesses, but that they purposefully crafted their order to sound as if they had the authority and ability to enforce business closures.   For reference the March 22, 2020 Resolution# R-20-006 In the Matter of the Continuance of a Local State of Emergency Within Tillamook County stated:

 The following closures shall go into effect no later than 12:00 p.m. on Monday, March 23, 2020: a. Closure of all county, state, and federal parks within Tillamook County. Current park hosts and employees of the park are allowed to remain in the park; b. Closure of all county parking lots, beach access, and certain parking areas along road rights-of-way; c. Closure of all county public boat launches to non-commercial users that do not commercial fish for the purpose of providing a retail food source; and d. Closure of all transient lodging facilities including, but not limited to, motels, hotels, short-term vacation rentals, bed and breakfasts, RV parks, and campgrounds.[Emphasis mine].

Mary Faith Bell makes it clear in her deposition that the intent of the Board of Tillamook County Commissioners was to compel compliance. For example, when asked if the commissioners had the authority to close state and federal parks Commissioner Bell replied, “We —we wanted to—again, to present a front that Tillamook County is closed. And —and to encourage our partners in outdoor recreation via the OPRD—Oregon Parks and Recreation Department—-and your—United States Forest Service to —to ask them to partner with us in this united front that Tillamook County is closed to visitors. And so —so we included that in the resolution. But they didn’t have to comply.(pg. 33 “Deposition of Mary Faith Bell 30 (b) (6) Tillamook County, OR Designee August 12, 2021, In the Matter of: Mankins Family LLC and Pacific City Inn v. Tillamook County, Oregon”).  Contrary to this statement under oath during the March 22, 2020 emergency meeting of the Tillamook Board of Commissioners that “to the extent that we CAN [emphasis mine] close transient lodging, we should. So I again would like to hear from legal counsel about what we can do about short-term rentals because these are private residents . . . could we prohibit air B and B’s?” County Counsel Joel Stevens replied, “I believe we can.”

So what did the Board of Commissioners believe they were acting legally or not? Under oath Mary Faith Bell asserts that they knew they did not have the authority to enforce or actually close any businesses, but during the public meetings she makes assertions such as “it is time to take bold action.” So while under the threat of perjury Bell clearly indicated the Commissioners did not have the authority to enforce closures, but in public, including on the Tillamook County website, Bell has presented the Commissioners as the “county health authority” and affirmed they do have the power to enact all kinds of legally questionable orders.

 This claim of being in health authority is echoed in Bell’s later testimony of this deposition. When asked if there was a “specific reason why the County chose not to make that fact clear to lodging owners that their compliance was completely voluntary” here was Bell’s response:

We were managing the pandemic. The county commissioners are the public health authority for the County. And we were trying to prevent people from coming to Tillamook County and bringing the virus with them. So we were looking for voluntary compliance. And we issued the resolution, as you know. And there—it wouldn’t have been in the best interest of the public health for us to say, But you can do this or not, if you want to. (Pg. 59)

Commissioner Mary Faith Bell makes it clear in this statement that she did not trust the citizens of Tillamook County, or at large (there was a concern about outside tourists) to make their own health decisions.  In fact, when the original March 22, 2020 Resolution # R-20-006 was passed there were zero COVID-19 cases in Tillamook County. This resolution was renewed monthly until June 10, 2020. Of course, the county has since stepped back from their original lockdown measures to merely keeping our county in a “state of emergency” on December 29, 2021 until June of 2022, unless they choose to renew the state of emergency, again. These state of emergencies have been unanimously voted on and signed by every current commissioner.

            Tillamook County was not held liable, in that on a technicality they won the law suit filed by the Mankins. However, this is not to say Tillamook County was not liable or that they acted on legal authority based on the testimony by Commissioner Bell or in the reality of the consequences of their decisions. Nor has history vindicated their decisions as Suzanne Weber affirmed it would when the Tillamook County Commissioners passed their original Resolution on March 22, 2020.

Remember the original reasoning of all lockdowns and closures was to “flatten the curve.” How did Tillamook County perform in that area? Mostly well, but then again COVID-19 had a survival rate of over 99%. In fact, the only “life-threatening surge” Tillamook County ever experienced was in late August/early September 2021, during which most of the 64 reported deaths in our county occurred. In other words, the Commissioners had a year and a half to help the county health providers for treatment of patients. To be fair, Oregon as a state has the least amount of hospital beds per capita and current data from OHA suggests that 93% of those that died in Oregon had underlying conditions. So perhaps we mustn’t judge our local leaders too harshly. However, any who personally lost a loved one to COVID-19 will have their own feelings on how our local leaders prepared for our belated surge. But in case you missed it the head administrator of Tillamook Adventist Hospital, Eric Swanson, just endorsed Mary Faith Bell for re-election as Tillamook County Commissioner.

            As we look toward the future and consider who should be making county resolutions, state or federal laws, we must look back on the record of those who have made those decisions. If hindsight is 20/20 let us not forget the lessons of 2020. Courageous leadership is required for trying times. Likeability will not save during a pandemic or foster economic stability. Freedom should be affirmed over fear.

Truth Post #1

I have been on an unplanned and necessary break from social media and politics. Life has taken our family on an adventure that has insulated us from much upheaval and influence from the outside world. The pause has been refreshing and clarifying. It turns out that good old manual labor allows your mind to think more deeply about issues than pegging away on a screen or following all the latest updates from people and the news.
I am going to be sharing some brief thoughts here in the coming weeks that I hope others will find helpful, encouraging, and insightful.

Truth Post#1 Truth is self-evident.

Yes. This is a much penned and voiced thought, but it has been under attack in ways that seems inconceivable. In fact, I am surprised that our elites have not tried to tell us the sky is not blue. And, unfortunately, there are many who would just accept whatever explanation was handed down to them by the “experts” and argue all their talking points while ignoring the obvious glaring truth in front of their own eyes.
Why does the truth not seem self-evident?

  1. Humans are blinded by a warped perception formed by their current situation, culture and experiences.
    Ever heard eye witness testimony from more than one person about a single happening? A person hits a tree with their car. The person following this car saw the car swerve out of control and hit the tree. A person in the other lane saw commotion in the oncoming car and then swerve and hit the tree. The passenger saw the driver have an epileptic seizure but did not see the car hit the tree, because they were rendered unconscious during the impact. All of these testimonies are true, but none of them give a full account. Still others hearing the testimony that have loved ones killed by reckless drivers or suffering from epilepsy will complicate the testimony by emotions. But, the car still hit a tree, regardless of differing eye witness accounts and feelings: It is self-evident.
  2. Accepting truth as self-evident means ceding one’s own thoughts and feelings to something greater than themselves.

Our society is full of Pilates and Garden Serpents. The Pilates ask, out of mockery or honest inquiry, “What is truth?” The Garden Serpents, who know the truth but hate it, ask, “Did God say . . .?” This is not to suggest it is immoral to seek the truth. Quite the contrary, seeking the truth is an admirable pursuit. However, to deny revealed truth is prideful, foolish, and will lead to destruction.
One caution concerning revealed truth: Humans are not all-knowing, and are bent on denying truth that would be self-convicting or worldview shifting. Being willing to admit one has been deceived by a lie takes humbleness and honesty. These are not qualities that are commonly practiced in our current culture, but are essential for personal growth.

We didn’t start the fire, but we will keep it burning: A new false doctrine

burning-emergency-fire-1749“And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell.” James 3:6

The world is on fire.

The United States in on fire. I speak not of the literal fires in cities across our great country, but of the fires swelling in our hearts and bursting out on our social media accounts. The fire aimed at one another through harsh words and worldly division. This fire is not staying without the church or family of believers: It has worked its way inside the doors of our hearts. Fire can be good, but if left unchecked it will certainly consume us.

Can a man take fire in his bosom, and his clothes not be burned?” Proverbs 6:27

What is the source of this fire?

Most of us have been on some kind of stay at home gubernatorial edict for almost 90 days. For nearly 90 days our contact with one another has been limited. Now, as it has opened up, we find ourselves behind masks, following arrows, and being reminded every five minutes by friendly public service announcements to wash our hands and keep 6 feet away from everyone. My initial feeling of being herded like a cow through the parking lot of Costco complete with crates for fences outside, and roped off areas inside has not abated.

Unfortunately, the above paragraph is just the background setting. Over 40 million  fellow citizens have lost their jobs. That is like the state of California becoming unemployed. We are told over 100,000 people have lost their lives from a virus shipped to us from a country that calls itself our enemy. Apparently, many of these deaths could have been avoided with better policies. More on that later, but in the mean time sit on that number. If the death count is correct that is the population of Bend, Oregon, one of the fastest growing cities in the United States (30% growth in the last ten years), wiped off the face of the earth.

It gets worse. Enter in the politicians. Never mind that the many of people that serve in all three levels of government (city, state, federal) are paid for by our hard earned tax dollars and hold their position only by the electorate. Many of these officials have now imagine themselves to have power. They do not legislate or enforce laws, they make edicts that are generally against their state constitutions and challenge the Constitution of the United States. It doesn’t really matter what your political persuasion is, there has been plenty for all to be frustrated or angry about.

If you weren’t bothered in general by our representative government, no worries the media found plenty of wood, hay, and stubble to throw on the rubble pile of our emotions. The media also only exist at our pleasure, but we just stare idly as they pile on the fuel and pour on the gasoline. They will report on the results of the fire, too. Either way the media retains their positions of employment and continue broadcasting from their elegant homes or state-of-the-art recording studios without suffering the consequences of the financial ruin of their fellow countrymen and profiting from reporting on the fire they started.

Thus far, the last 90 days has separated us physically, emotionally, politically, and spiritually. Yes, apparently the virus spreads mostly at houses of worship. This is why even though most churches have presented and initiated the most strict plans to operate that can be imagined, many governors have arbitrarily decided churches cannot meet. If they do meet then they must only worship with in certain prescription given by our benevolent rulers. Sure we can still read our Bibles,pray, and watch church at home. However, as a person that has attended church multiple times a week for over twenty years, it is not the same. In fact, a few weeks ago I struggled to attend online church: Despite an amazing online service it just seemed fake.

All of the above is so overwhelming that most of us have become numb to it. We pretend we will all get through this together, even though we are not together.  Even though we are about to be ripped apart by what the media constantly presents to us as a raging race, class and political ideological war. It is as if the media’s mantra is, “Burn baby, burn.” And for some of them, it is. You don’t even have to guess at their motive. They printed it in their premier publications as the 1619 project (1619 Project, NY Times),and awarded the author it’s highest honors, the Pulitzer Prize( 1619 Project Pulitzer Prize).Even as someone who knows the inaccuracy and the audacity of this hatred-filled document, I have to admit it has been successful. Just look at the ashes across the United States of America.

But, our great country is of the people, and by the people. We cannot eternally play the blame game. The personal attacks are becoming worse than ever. Social media is more like a school yard full of mean children. Anger is now burning up ties of family and friendship to a crisp. Probably the only way to salvage personal relationships is to unplug completely. Hopefully it will be more difficult to call each other names if we have to see the pain it causes splashed across each others’ faces.

However single driving factor of the fury is based an eternal truth placed in your heart by the Creator, the shedding of innocent blood. This is what finally, ignited the fire and allowed it to keep burning.

It is not an accident that we are disturbed by photos, audio, and video that shows what can only be interpreted as the destruction of the life of innocent people. None of us want anyone to fear being gunned down by neighbors while they are out on a run. None of us wants a single person to be killed while submitting to an arrest. It should scream through our souls that these are outright injustices. They are. And, we should want the perpetrators to face the just consequences through due process.

It is good and right to demand justice through legal means. What is interesting is that is exactly what is taking place. Everyone is horrified, everyone wants justice. Justice is currently working through the process. Yet the anger remains.

Why not the anger at governors who ordered elder homes to take in patients with the virus from the hospital? Please do not tell me they did not know it would kill elderly people (they sent extra body bags). Cuomo sent over 4,300 recovering Covid patients to nursing homes

Why not be angry that while all “non-emergency” and “elective” medical procedures being suspended, abortions continued–especially in black neighborhoods?(Planned Parenthood Targets Black Neighborhoods )Margret Sanger would be proud of her legacy of eugenics through Planned Parenthood. (Margaret Sanger and Eugenics)

Where is our angst against the Communist Party of China? Is it too hard to care about Hong Kong, Chinese Christians and human right activists, Uighar Muslims (The Fate of Uighur Muslims in China), and a virus that has had terrible world-wide consequences ? (China let 5 Million People Leave Wuhan ) How very convenient for China that our country is turning on itself at this time.

This is not to insinuate we should be more angry, it is a plea to get balanced. It is a gentle reminder, every life is precious and has purpose.

Why is there still so much anger?

The power of the story of one, such as Ahmaud Arbery and George Floyd, can be far reaching. We should all be horrified at their loss of life,and what their families are suffering. The grief has been multiplied by the endless replaying of their deaths. This is not to mention the hurt the rioting and looting, supposedly done in protest of their deaths, is causing their families and communities.

As we obsess over these ones are we forgetting the millions?

My faith in Christ demands an even approach. I do not suggest here that we do not follow what God has put in us to be passionate about. I believe there may be God-given reasons for one to personally care more about one situation than another. However, if we leave our passions unchecked, we will be part of the problem and not the solution.

Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, be put away from you, with all malice . . .” Ephesians 4:31

Our focus on racism is diminishing our real need for moral fortitude based on the solid foundation of God’s Word. It is distracting from a deeper sin, the shedding of innocent blood, that is rampant around us through abortion, despicable actions by governors concerning nursing homes, the killing of George Floyd, and many others.

In the end, those who claim Christ should ask three questions: What is the purpose of my anger? How does God view the situation I am angry about? What would God have me do that will change things for the better?

Perhaps most important we should remember, “Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, and slow to wrath; For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.” James 1:19-20

Christians, there is enough fire in the world. It is time to throw some water on the fire. But, let us not make peace on false pretenses: Spraying just enough water to keep the fire at bay. This fire must drenched by the Living Water, Jesus Christ. Let us cleanse our own hearts before the Lord, and spread the good news of the gospel to every person. Finally, let us lead the way, fellow believers, in love for one another without preference or unnecessary division.

Let nothing be done through strife or vain glory; but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves.”  Philippians 2:3

 

 

 

Do you need some change?

And Jesus called a little child unto Him, and set him in the midst of them, and said, Verily, I say unto you, Except ye be converted , and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. Matthew 18: 2-3

“Do you have some change, ma’m?”

This was probably the third or fourth time in a week I had been approached by a stranger with the same question. I try to be prepared with something to give these needy souls: Small amounts of money or snacks, and a tract containing the message of salvation. I am not always prepared, and, quite honestly, there are rare occasions I just don’t want to bother with the interruption to my day. But, I try.

“I think I have some change. Just give me a moment here, ” I responded while I rummaged through my very full purse. How is it that you can have several pockets and a purse organizer and still not manage to keep your purse in order?

I prayed as I dug to find something to give this woman for the right words to speak to her. As I pulled out my coin purse (it had been stuck under my purse organizer), I realized I only had a few small coins on me. I looked apologetically into her electric blue eyes, and said, “I am sorry. This is all I have.”

As I handed the change to her she thanked me. She would have walked away, but I stopped her. I wanted to give her more. I had something worth more than all the treasures in the world to share with her: I had Jesus. While I can’t say it was the most successful gospel presentation, before the lady walked away I was able to share some truth and some of my own personal testimony of Christ. She was open enough to let me pray for her, and some of her immediate needs. Then we parted ways. As I write this I wonder if she is safe, if she is suffering out in the heat of the high desert, and whether she truly understands the way of salvation.

This woman that stopped me in the parking lot of Walmart on a hot Southern California day did not hide that she was in physical need. But, she was quick to hide behind an experience that may be masking her spiritual need. There was no difference between her and all the other people in the parking lot that day, except her physical need put her in a position to hear about the ultimate remedy for her greatest need–spiritual life through Jesus Christ.

As I ponder this seemingly incidental happening, I am again reminded that it is only when we understand our own desperate need for salvation that we are willing to look outside of ourselves and up to the outstretched hands of God.

I was pretty desperate when I came to Christ. I am sure both my parents loved me and wanted to meet my needs, but they were just as lost as I was with a hundred times the responsibility. As a result our home life was tumultuous. I was about five years old and I was starving for stability.

Somehow I got invited to a vacation Bible school in a gospel preaching church in my hometown of Mountain Home, Idaho. I wish I knew the name of the church, or the bus driver that drove the bus, or the pastor, but I have not a clue who were these faithful servants to the Lord. All I remember is that on the last day we all sat out and heard a full sermon by the pastor. When he gave an invitation to come forward to receive Christ, I went. I went because somehow I knew that a Heavenly Father was waiting to make me His child, and I wanted that enough to step out in front of total strangers. I lady came and talked to me about asking Jesus into my heart, and I did so immediately.

I wish I could say I have always responded to the Holy Spirit that obediently, but anyone who knows me, believers and unbelievers, knows that is not true. But, I do know this: That seemingly incidental happening changed the course of my life and my eternal destiny. And while I cannot boast a life not scarred by my own willful sin, I can boast that Jesus has never turned is back on me.

As a result, I am not the same. I am not the same person I was before I got saved. I am not the same person I was before I committed my life to following Christ. I am not same person I was ten years ago: I am not even the same person I was ten weeks ago. Christ has been patiently drawing me more to Himself, and I would not have it any other way.

Do I have change? More than you could imagine, dear one.

How to Ruin a School District in 3 Years: The Tale of a Sleepy School District and One Unbridled Superintendent

Beaver School MuralI hate alarm clocks. Lamentably, they are a necessary evil. Having a very full schedule I have to wake up 6 days of the week earlier than I would prefer. So I must have an alarm clock. Of course, most of us use our phones as alarm clocks now days, and can pick from a variety of alarm sounds. We can even create our own alarm jingle. For a while I tried to use the song “Overcomer” by Mandisa for my alarm. It’s a fun, positive, peppy song. That lasted about two months: Now I hate that song. I don’t even allow it to play on my radio.

Know what I hate more than an alarm? Snooze settings. What wicked person ever thought of such a thing? Who wants to be reawakened every ten minutes to the same horrible racket when you were obviously too tired to wake up the first time? It doesn’t help that I am married to man that has been both a farmer and a truck driver who legitimately needs that snooze option. But it is fair to say my affection for snooze alarms is not growing any stronger.

Imagine my horror at realizing I am the snooze alarm. Even worse, I may have contributed to the lullaby that put us all back to sleep in the first place. Nevertheless, there is a time that someone has to be willing to step up and sound the alarm. I have looked for someone else. I have nudged a few. I have downright dared a few to take up the mantle. But, at the end of the day I was the one left alone with the knowledge, personal experience and responsibility to sound the alarm.  So with much regret,  I am going to play my jingle again–only louder.

I recently wrote a blog about several policies the Nestucca Valley School Board passed that undermined the First Amendment rights of teachers ( Teaching on Religion IGAC) and parental rights (Human Sexuality, AIDS/HIV, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Health Education IGAI) What is that smell in our sleepy Nestucca Valley? At the time of that blog I was completely oblivious to Nestucca Valley School District’s current gun free zone policy (Weapons–Students JFCJ). However, I have since come to a full understanding, and I am awake.

While I was originally misinformed about this policy, I was also duped by the June Nestucca Valley School District Board agenda with a lot of “mistakes” as to what was a “Policy First Reading–Proposed Adoption” and was a “Second Reading of Policy/Policy Adoption–Deletion.” I should note to the reader that these policies are not read out loud as these lines suggest by the board at the meeting, unless there is a grammatical error. Grammatical errors demand the policies be read in part, not in full. Also, I had only received electronic copies of the policies a few days prior and had very little time to peruse through them, let alone thoroughly inspect them. Finally, the board was referring to page numbers in a document I did not possess. I confess that I was struggling to follow the progression of the meeting.

However, the most pertinent happening that led to my confusion was a comment by Superintendent, Misty Wharton.  I had been alerted to some possible weapons policy changes by a comment at the May meeting by board member Diane Boisa. Therefore, I went ahead and voiced concerned about making our school district a gun free zone 24/7, year round, on all school property and at every place the district holds an event given that 98% of mass shootings occur in Gun Free Zones (Crime Research Center ) at the June 10th meeting. I received a lot of interesting looks from board members, but not one bothered to point out that they had already established Nestucca Valley School District as a Gun Free Zone (Former JFCJ Weapons-Students). However, Ms. Wharton did comment that the board was not voting on that policy that night. Several minutes later the board voted to approve all their proposed and deleted polices I-K/L, all 684 pages, in one swoop. There was not a nay or a even a question by a single board member: Next agenda item, moving on. And, yes, JFCJ Weapons in Schools–Students was one of those policies.

In all fairness to Ms. Wharton, she may have been referring to the Weapons policy for staff members Weapons –Staff GBJ. I did not reference that policy, but made my comments based on a quick review of the above referenced Weapons–Student policy. Furthermore, the board secretary noted in the minutes for that meeting that my public comment was concerning JFCJ (these minutes are not available online at this time, but can be requested at the district office).  Does that make Ms. Wharton’s assertion after my public testimony that the board would not be approving a new gun policy a lie? I don’t know. However, I can tell you that when I realized the worse of the two policies had already been passed I felt lied to. I felt deceived. I felt totally hoodwinked by my school board members and the superintendent. I will leave the sorting out of motives and intentions to the only True and Righteous Judge.

So how has the Weapons in Schools–Student policy (JFCJ) changed? Not a lot, with the exception of giving the superintendent to the power to refer “all other policy violations” to law enforcement. Prior to this the policy was rather vague about punishment “other persons” or non-student violators may face. So what kind of violations did our board just give the superintendent the right to report to law enforcement? For one, “possession of a firearm within 1000ft. of school property.” Full reading of the weapons policy leaves one to wonder if their can have certain fertilizers, a taser, or bear spray in their home or on their person within 1000ft. of school property. And, by the way, staff members must  report if you have such items within the Gun Free Zone up to 120 days after you violated the policy.

And, so now we have a school district that demands teachers renounce their personal convictions on faith and family. We have a school district that requires teachers to spend a specific amount of hours teaching “health” that includes transgenderism. A school district that readily provides minors with access to abortion on demand at all stages of pregnancy without parental notification. A school district that requires for staff to report if they see people in their homes next to the school with firearms, pepper spray or fertilizer up to 120 days after the fact that they noticed these items. Is this the school district your taxes pay for, you send your kids to, and that 3 generations of your family has graduated from? The school district funded by your property taxes and local timber sales? Why, yes it is.

So how did this happen? How do you ruin a school district in 3 years?

  1. Don’t go to board meetings. They are boring. They don’t listen to the patrons. They are not scheduled at convenient times.
  2. When you hear of your school board doing some strange things, rather covertly, and suddenly there is a new superintendent, don’t question it. Just go with it. Now the kids can play dodge ball again. Life goes on.
  3. Be so excited and trusting of your temporary superintendent because they are “local” that you become more entrenched about #1 and less questioning about anything.
  4. Don’t question how the interim superintendent suddenly became the permanent (3 year contract) superintendent even though the job offer was never on a meeting agenda. Then refer back to #3.
  5.  Assume that the board members are more interested in representing you than seeing through their personal agendas or those of the superintendent.
  6. If you begin to question the motives of the board or administration never call, question, or email them. Just re-elect them. They will get it right eventually.
  7. Assume that the board and the superintendent know more than you do. They are the experts on all the educational laws and regulations. You are just the parent or community member, you don’t understand all these complex issues
  8. Let the superintendent answer all statements and questions to the board members. Sure, they’re your elected officials responsible to you, but she is the one taking charge. Just roll with it.

Now, you understand why I called myself the snooze alarm. This is not pleasant to the ear. Especially if you are tired of hearing about it. And some of you have probably tried to voice concerns to the superintendent or the board members, but felt defeated or ignored. Trust me, I have tried to deal with many of these issues with them privately. They are not budging .

I have been guilty of all of the things on that list. If you feel that I am pointing a finger at this community, then rest I assured I know I have 3 fingers pointing back at me. I am quite possibly more responsible than anyone other than our board members and superintendent. Why? Because I knew the truth. I knew how the superintendent got her permanent job offer (3 year contract) in April 2017, and I did not make it public. I knew that she would have conflicting worldviews with most of the community, but hoped she would set those aside to be a true public servant. I even did a very flattering interview for the current superintendent for the Tillamook County Pioneer soon after her job offer. I have been responsible for leading the public to trust Misty Wharton.

Unfortunately, she has proven herself unworthy of our trust, and our elected school board members have refused to do their job of supervising her. In fact, it was Superintendent Wharton that gave newly elected board member, Bill Haggerty, his oath of office. In case, you missed the gravity of this happening: Mr. Haggerty is her boss, but she gave him his oath and shook his hand. Who’s the boss?

So the snooze alarm has sounded again. Are you willing to get out of bed this time? Is there not a cause for this community to come together and say enough is enough. People came from all over the state this year to protest cap and trade, gun restrictions, and mandatory vaccination bills proposed in Salem. Our we willing to fight for our constitutional rights in our own backyard? If you don’t, then expect a fight in a courtroom near you soon, paid for by you on both sides of the litigation. Or perhaps we are willing to let our schools be one more site for a school shooting in a “gun free zone?”

Let’s do what small, rural communities do best: Wake up early, go to work and support one another in a worthy cause. This is our school and our community. Let’s own it.